Barbora Vanek - Individual Identified in Recent News Report

Barbora Vanek - Individual Identified in Recent News Report

In the world of architecture, a shift towards regenerative practices is gaining momentum, with a focus on biodiversity and biomimetic design. One architect at the forefront of this movement is Barbora Vanek, a Building Performance Specialist based in the Bristol office of AHMM.

Vanek's team is renowned for their work in re-purposing existing buildings, such as Angel Square and 1 Victoria Street, and embarking on regenerative projects like Arthur Stanley House and the TQEC Research Hub in Bristol. The latter was reinvented from structures that might have been demolished, demonstrating the team's commitment to sustainability.

Their approach is rooted in learning from nature's efficient, adaptable, and sustainable strategies. Two main procedural approaches in biomimetic architecture are employed: bottom-up, which mimics the mechanical properties of natural materials, and top-down, which optimises existing technologies by applying biological insights.

Large-scale biomimetic projects often involve interdisciplinary collaboration, bringing together architects, biologists, engineers, material scientists, designers, computer scientists, and mathematicians. Techniques inspired by biological algorithms, such as those derived from slime mold's efficient connection of points, are applied to optimise material use and structural integrity.

However, challenges remain. Mimicking complex biological functions or ecosystems at large architectural scales is difficult due to the multifaceted nature of living systems and their interactions with built environments. Effective collaboration among specialists with diverse expertise can be challenging, requiring shared languages and goals to integrate biology with architecture and engineering successfully.

Advanced biomimetic designs often depend on cutting-edge materials and fabrication methods, which may not be fully mature, are costly, or have production limitations. Ensuring that regenerative architecture actually supports local biodiversity involves understanding ecological dynamics and not just incorporating 'green' features superficially.

Scalability and cost are also concerns, as biomimetic approaches can be more resource-intensive initially. Technologies inspired by nature require rigorous testing in built environments to confirm performance, durability, and maintenance feasibility over time.

Despite these challenges, Vanek is optimistic. She tends to get involved with projects in the early design stages, where she can have the most impact. Many of AHMM's projects that are now considered regenerative were conceived before regenerative architecture became commonplace.

Vanek would like to see regenerative architecture extend beyond strategies like re-use, material passports, and lifecycle assessment. She believes it should be the framing paradigm of future practice. The construction industry, as one of the largest greenhouse gas emitters, bears a responsibility to address the challenges posed by climate change and biodiversity loss.

The shift in awareness about sustainability discourse among architects, clients, and design teams has been observed in recent years. Vanek attributes this to their approach to designing spaces and to their clients who encouraged such an approach. Her team is a participant in the Regenerative Architecture Index, reflecting their commitment to this movement.

Vanek considers the decline in biodiversity to be an emergency as pressing as rising temperatures. She advocates for architecture that embraces true biodiversity and biomimetic design, believing that it is not just about creating sustainable buildings but also about creating spaces that benefit and coexist with nature.

The Metropolis project, a regenerative project that involves a combination of re-use and CLT-steel hybrid structural extension, is a testament to this vision. As regenerative architecture continues to evolve, it is clear that Vanek and her team are at the forefront, pushing the boundaries of what is possible in the pursuit of a more sustainable and biodiverse future.

[1] Ferreira, R., & Braga, J. (2020). Biomimicry and biomimetic design in architecture. In Handbook of research on sustainable architecture (pp. 269-289). IGI Global. [2] Gomez, S. (2020). Biomimetic design: A review of the state of the art. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (pp. 511-520). AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). [3] Koh, J. (2020). Biomimicry: Nature-inspired innovation for sustainable energy. In Renewable and sustainable energy reviews (Vol. 135, pp. 112400). Elsevier.

1. Barbora Vanek, with her focus on biodiversity and biomimetic design, advocates for architecture that not only creates sustainable buildings but also spaces that benefit and coexist with nature, claiming the decline in biodiversity to be an emergency as pressing as rising temperatures.
2. In the realm of health-and-wellness, effective collaboration among specialists with diverse expertise can be challenging, as it requires shared languages and goals to integrate biology with architecture and engineering successfully, just like the interdisciplinary collaboration in large-scale biomimetic projects.
3. As the construction industry seeks to address the challenges posed by climate change and biodiversity loss, Vanek believes regenerative architecture should be the framing paradigm of future practice, extending beyond strategies like re-use, material passports, and lifecycle assessment to encompass the principles of environmental-science and climate-change mitigation.

Read also: