Alleged Legal Evidence Highlighting the Potential Criminal Acts and Intent of Individuals Linked to the COVID Fraud + Vaccine Biological Weapon Deployment Strategy
The Evidence Against Pfizer's COVID-19 Vaccine
In a series of claims made by James R. Flack, a Canadian investigator, Pfizer's clinical protocol for its COVID-19 vaccine is scrutinized, suggesting potential issues with the usage of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), adverse event suppression, and ethical concerns regarding the vaccination of children.
Lipid Nanoparticle Evidence
Flack claims to have uncovered evidence from Pfizer's own clinical protocol (Protocol C4591001, November 2020) that reveals the use of LNPs in the vaccine, a delivery method never before used in a licensed vaccine. While the toxicity profiles were known, there was no prior study of biodistribution in humans before deployment. Specifically, Page 9 of the protocol (Exhibit A9) confirms the use of LNPs, and Page 139 (Exhibit A139) lists LNP and LPX as core components alongside indicators of immunogenicity and hepatotoxicity, which Flack suggests is damning evidence.
Adverse Event Illusion and Legal Insulation
Regarding adverse events, Flack asserts that Pfizer designed its trial to suppress adverse event data before it was revealed to the public. According to Exhibit B7 (Page 7 of the protocol) narrow adverse event definitions were used, only focusing on visible, immediate effects. Anything slow, subtle, or systemic was designed to fall through the cracks. Furthermore, Page 10 (Exhibit B10) states that systemic adverse events would be monitored for just 7 days post-injection, with neurological, autoimmune, or cardiac effects developing weeks later deliberately excluded.
Pediatric Crimes
Before long-term adult safety data was available, Pfizer authorized human experimentation on children, which Flack describes as unethical and reckless. Page 13 (Exhibit C13) of the protocol admits that children aged 12-15 were included in immunogenicity testing early in the trial, before adult safety signals could emerge. This violation of basic age-sequencing in medical ethics is problematic, as are failures to protect children as a vulnerable population in experimental research (a violation of the Declaration of Helsinki) and the lack of monitoring for developmental or systemic harms over time.
Internal Warnings Ignored
Flack also cites internal Pfizer documents revealing a large number of adverse events and thousands of deaths in early reporting, which he suggests were suppressed for 75 years. This raises concerns about potential criminal misconduct.
Democide Proof
Furthermore, Flack presents government death data (Statistics Canada) and Pfizer's own internal safety reports as proof of a coordinated cover-up of mass injury and death following the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, particularly affecting children and healthy individuals.
Summary of Criminal Evidence
Flack concludes by presenting official internal Pfizer documentation exposing systematic misconduct within the C4591001 vaccine trial. The evidence supports potential criminal referrals for negligence, fraud, and crimes against humanity.
While these claims are significant, it is necessary to emphasize that they come from a single investigator and have not been independently verified or validated by credible scientific or regulatory bodies. It is important for the public to remain informed and engaged in the ongoing discussion and evaluation of vaccine safety and ethical considerations.
Enrichment Data:- The use of lipid nanoparticles as a delivery method for Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine is well-established in the scientific community, providing protection for the mRNA and facilitating its cellular uptake.- Long-term safety and efficacy data for the vaccine have been collected and reviewed by multiple independent bodies, with myocarditis noted as a rare but mostly mild side effect.- Criticisms exist regarding public health communication and the timeliness of alerting practitioners about potential risks, but these do not suggest that Pfizer knowingly suppressed adverse event data or used LNPs without sufficient safety information.- The allegations made by James R. Flack require further investigation and independent verification to substantiate the claims of criminal misconduct. It is crucial to approach these claims with caution and to seek reliable sources for accurate information on vaccine safety and ethical considerations.
- Flack's claims suggest that the usage of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), a delivery method for Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine, has questionable implications for human health as prior studies on biodistribution in humans were lacking before the vaccine's deployment.
- Freedom of information and civil liberties are at stake as Flack argues that Pfizer intentionally suppressed adverse event data related to its COVID-19 vaccine, focusing only on visible, immediate effects, while excluding slow, subtle, or systemic side effects.
- The ethical concerns raised by Flack revolve around the vaccination of children as Pfizer authorized human experimentation on minors before long-term adult safety data was available, potentially violating the Declaration of Helsinki and putting children at risk.
- Health and wellness, as well as general news, have been deeply impacted by the controversy surrounding Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine, with allegations of thousands of deaths and adverse events being suppressed for 75 years, raising questions about potential criminal misconduct.
- Articles addressing crime and justice may cover the implication of these claims, which, if substantiated, could result in criminal referrals for negligence, fraud, and crimes against humanity.
- Science, specifically in the field of medical-conditions and health-and-wellness, continues to face scrutiny as independent verification of Flack's claims is necessary to establish the truth about the potential misconduct within Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine trial.
